Archive by Author

Dr Foster and questionable statistics

Article in the BMJ, following on from blogpost below. Free link isn’t working, so posted below   Observations Medicine and the Media Consultant cover and mortality among hospital patients BMJ 2012; 344 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8276 (Published 11 January 2012)Cite this as: BMJ 2012;344:d8276 Article Related content Metrics Responses Margaret McCartney, general practitioner, Glasgow margaret{at}margaretmccartney.com Dr Foster’s […]

Continue Reading →

Read your medical records

Essentially, having access to your own medical records is a good thing. The government have made it clear that this is now a priority and intend to work to make online access for patients so that patients can freely access their own notes. However: I think as it stands it’s unlikely to be very helpful. […]

Continue Reading →

Public health and Freud Communications

It is with a heavy heart that I note the Department of Health are not paying attention to the evidence. They have press released their new contract with Freud Communications, who apparently have  “delivered a really exciting pitch. They have some big ideas that we believe will not only promote good health but will really change people’s […]

Continue Reading →

recent BMJ articles

Free links, for reference Barnardo’s misleading survey: publicity at what cost? and Worst cases of patient care in the NHS and wee news piece Janssen funds networking site to promote better mental health commissioning   There was also a piece in the Times about paracetamol but it’s behind a wall.

Continue Reading →

Dr Foster, association and causation

The headlines today have been driven by publication of the ‘Dr Foster’ (“the UK’s leading provider of comparative information on health and social care services”) annual hospital guide. The Guardian have reported it as have the Telegraph, who  headline  “Experts warn hospitals not to cut staff over weekend death risk.” They have presented their data as […]

Continue Reading →

False hope and real living

The Quackometer has had some rather unpleasant emails following his criticism of the Burzynski clinic. The issue is that some people wanted to kindly raise money for a child with cancer to be treated there, when the evidence for the proffered interventions is questionable. Other people have examined the science very well. There is something […]

Continue Reading →