https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1806842

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1806842/suppl_file/nejmoa1806842_appendix.pdf

stuff I’ve written about this trial before in 2014

Adrenaline and cardiac arrest trial – ethics and evidence

and I’d like to know how the ethicists who were so opposed to this trial think now that we have evidence of the harm adrenaline has been doing: would they rather we had kept going with adrenaline and continued to do harm regardless?